Comments on: Autocar Readers Defy Emissions Beliefs http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/autocar-readers-defy-emissions-beliefs/ Bridging the gap between reality and official science Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:26:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: P_Drake http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/autocar-readers-defy-emissions-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-1631 P_Drake Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:16:52 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=489#comment-1631 The theory of AGW is not true and is a ruse to tax us on the air that we breathe. In fact it is a way of the powers that be to licence the weather to us which is as preposterous as it sounds but nevertheless true. Water vapour is the main greenhouse gas plain and simple - the natural variation in water vapour negates any effects that co2 impact may have and according to many sources there is a ceiling to the effects of co2 anyway! Add to this that during the Paleozoic and mesozoic periods co2 content was several thousand PPM and has steadily decreased in an almost linear fashion to present where climate is more stable than it has ever been. If co2 was able to cause a runaway feedback mechanism then it would have done so rather than declining to present day levels and one should not that temperature has remained stable throughout these periods except for ice ages. Any rebuttals to these simple facts are just rhetoric - people like to think of themselves as scientifically minded and always find some weak angle to find a human connection and these AGW theories are so convoluted and twisted that I am convinced that these warmist theorists are on some form of drugs!! Those of you who may be concerned that we are running out of oil - dont be - you might possibly enjoy a book by Professor Thomas Gold called "the deep hot biosphere" which is a most interesting read and throws many geological theories out on their head. The logic is irrefutable and I have heard no convincing arguments that really stand up to what he and most Ukrainian/Russians scientists have long established as fact. May we all continue to learn. The theory of AGW is not true and is a ruse to tax us on the air that we breathe.
In fact it is a way of the powers that be to licence the weather to us which is as preposterous as it sounds but nevertheless true.
Water vapour is the main greenhouse gas plain and simple – the natural variation in water vapour negates any effects that co2 impact may have and according to many sources there is a ceiling to the effects of co2 anyway!
Add to this that during the Paleozoic and mesozoic periods co2 content was several thousand PPM and has steadily decreased in an almost linear fashion to present where climate is more stable than it has ever been.
If co2 was able to cause a runaway feedback mechanism then it would have done so rather than declining to present day levels and one should not that temperature has remained stable throughout these periods except for ice ages.
Any rebuttals to these simple facts are just rhetoric – people like to think of themselves as scientifically minded and always find some weak angle to find a human connection and these AGW theories are so convoluted and twisted that I am convinced that these warmist theorists are on some form of drugs!!
Those of you who may be concerned that we are running out of oil – dont be – you might possibly enjoy a book by Professor Thomas Gold called “the deep hot biosphere” which is a most interesting read and throws many geological theories out on their head. The logic is irrefutable and I have heard no convincing arguments that really stand up to what he and most Ukrainian/Russians scientists have long established as fact.
May we all continue to learn.

]]> By: Timothy Birdnow http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/autocar-readers-defy-emissions-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-1129 Timothy Birdnow Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:14:55 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=489#comment-1129 Great post, Dr. Biggs! I wanted to commend you on your response to Andrew Glikson at CCNET; I had wanted to write a response myself to him, since he was so clearly wrong on so many of his arguments. You did a terrific job of demolishing that foolishness! Great post, Dr. Biggs!

I wanted to commend you on your response to Andrew Glikson at CCNET; I had wanted to write a response myself to him, since he was so clearly wrong on so many of his arguments. You did a terrific job of demolishing that foolishness!

]]> By: Live long enough and you’re likely to outgrow this global warming obsession - Orange Punch - OCRegister.com http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/autocar-readers-defy-emissions-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-967 Live long enough and you’re likely to outgrow this global warming obsession - Orange Punch - OCRegister.com Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:43:59 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=489#comment-967 [...] to this fascinating survey, you are far more likely to be a global warming skeptic the older you get. A whopping 54 per cent [...] [...] to this fascinating survey, you are far more likely to be a global warming skeptic the older you get. A whopping 54 per cent [...]

]]>