Climate Research News

Climate Research News

Bridging the gap between reality and official science

Climate Research News Comments Feed Comments Climate Research News Entries Feed Entries
 
 
 
 

Systematic Bias in Simulated Monthly Mean Temperature and Precipitation in Regional Climate Models

A new paper has been recently published in GRL entitled: ‘On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation,’ by Christensen et al

The Abstract states:

Within the framework of the European project ENSEMBLES (ensembles-based predictions of climate changes and their impacts) we explore the systematic bias in simulated monthly mean temperature and precipitation for an ensemble of thirteen regional climate models (RCMs). The models have been forced with the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting Reanalysis (ERA40) and are compared to a new high resolution gridded observational data set. We find that each model has a distinct systematic bias relating both temperature and precipitation bias to the observed mean. By excluding the twenty-five percent warmest and wettest months, respectively, we find that a derived second-order fit from the remaining months can be used to estimate the values of the excluded months. We demonstrate that the common assumption of bias cancellation (invariance) in climate change projections can have significant limitations when temperatures in the warmest months exceed 4–6 °C above present day conditions.

The authors state in the Summary and Conclusions:

We have found that model biases have the potential to grow when used for climate change simulations under global warming conditions. We have demonstrated that in warmer and wetter climatic conditions, it is quite conceivable that a significant systematic model bias will dominate increase, generally resulting in an enhanced warm bias with increasing temperature and hence lead to an overestimation of the projected warming. Similarly, systematic precipitation biases depending on the precipitation amounts themselves may lead to either an over- or underestimation of the projected precipitation changes. These tendencies will be model specific, and here we have made a simplistic approach to capture the intrinsic model behaviours.

Leave a Reply

 

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Archives

Categories

Tags

Links

Twitter

Miniposts

New Booker Book: The Real Global Warming Disaster
Christopher Booker has a new book out entitled: The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is The Obsession With `Climate Change` Turning Out To Be The Most Costly Scientific Blunder In History? Available from Amazon UK here: More from Booker himself here. (1)

Why the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are Not Collapsing
Read the AIG News paper here. (1)

Global Warming Ate My Data
We’ve lost the numbers: CRU responds to FOIA requests. The Register (3)

Climate Depot's Arctic Fact Sheet
Climate Depot Arctic Fact Sheet (for additional updates on the Arctic see new articles tagged Arctic) (0)

Feedback

Meta