Comments
Short Term Sea Level Rise Slows by 20%
A new paper published in Global and Planetary Change by Cazenave et al entitled, ‘Sea level budget over 2003–2008: A reevaluation from GRACE space gravimetry, satellite altimetry and Argo’ suggests that sea level rise has slowed by 20% for 2003 to 2008, compared to 1993 to 2003 (2.5mm/yr compared to 3.1mm/yr).
The Abstract states:
From the IPCC 4th Assessment Report published in 2007, ocean thermal expansion contributed by ∼50% to the 3.1 mm/yr observed global mean sea level rise during the 1993–2003 decade, the remaining rate of rise being essentially explained by shrinking of land ice. Recently published results suggest that since about 2003, ocean thermal expansion change, based on the newly deployed Argo system, is showing a plateau while sea level is still rising, although at a reduced rate (∼2.5 mm/yr). Using space gravimetry observations from GRACE, we show that recent years sea level rise can be mostly explained by an increase of the mass of the oceans. Estimating GRACE-based ice sheet mass balance and using published estimates for glaciers melting, we further show that ocean mass increase since 2003 results by about half from an enhanced contribution of the polar ice sheets – compared to the previous decade – and half from mountain glaciers melting. Taking also into account the small GRACE-based contribution from continental waters (b0.2 mm/yr), we find a total ocean mass contribution of ∼2 mm/yr over 2003–2008. Such a value represents ∼80% of the altimetry-based rate of sea level rise over that period.We next estimate the steric sea level (i.e., ocean thermal expansion plus salinity effects) contribution from: (1) the difference between altimetry-based sea level and ocean mass change and (2) Argo data. Inferred steric sea level rate from (1) (∼0.3 mm/yr over 2003–2008) agrees well with the Argo-based value also estimated here (0.37 mm/yr over 2004–2008). Furthermore, the sea level budget approach presented in this study allows us to constrain independent estimates of the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) correction applied to GRACE-based ocean and ice sheet mass changes, as well as of glaciers melting. Values for the GIA correction and glacier contribution needed to close the sea level budget and explain GRACE-based mass estimates over the recent years agree well with totally independent determinations.
January 14th, 2009 at 12:51 am
What is interesting if you actually read the paper is that the raw satellite data shows no increase in sea level at all! The 2.5 mm/yr rise only appears after an ‘adjustment’ or ‘GIA correction’ is applied to the data (this sounds familiar – haven’t we heard this story before somewhere?). What’s more, this ‘correction’ can only be found by ‘GIA modelling’. In other words, the only justification for any sea level rise at all is in the modelling assumptions of the ‘climate scientists’ involved.