http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/short-term-sea-level-rise-slows-by-20/ Bridging the gap between reality and official science Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:26:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/short-term-sea-level-rise-slows-by-20/comment-page-1/#comment-62623 nofreewind Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:12:21 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=667#comment-62623 And the rise in sea level continues to slow....getting even slower since this paper was published. http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg And the rise in sea level continues to slow….getting even slower since this paper was published.
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/current/sl_ib_ns_global.jpg

]]> http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/short-term-sea-level-rise-slows-by-20/comment-page-1/#comment-44997 TWAWKI » CSIRO sea level superstitions Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:00:03 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=667#comment-44997 [...] than increasing as predicted by the CSIRO sea level rise since 2000 has been diminishing, and has dropped approximately 20% (see more here). This would correlate well with the declining heat content of the oceans over [...] [...] than increasing as predicted by the CSIRO sea level rise since 2000 has been diminishing, and has dropped approximately 20% (see more here). This would correlate well with the declining heat content of the oceans over [...]

]]> http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/short-term-sea-level-rise-slows-by-20/comment-page-1/#comment-5621 PaulM Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:51:47 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=667#comment-5621 What is interesting if you actually read the paper is that the raw satellite data shows no increase in sea level at all! The 2.5 mm/yr rise only appears after an 'adjustment' or 'GIA correction' is applied to the data (this sounds familiar - haven't we heard this story before somewhere?). What's more, this 'correction' can only be found by 'GIA modelling'. In other words, the only justification for any sea level rise at all is in the modelling assumptions of the 'climate scientists' involved. What is interesting if you actually read the paper is that the raw satellite data shows no increase in sea level at all! The 2.5 mm/yr rise only appears after an ‘adjustment’ or ‘GIA correction’ is applied to the data (this sounds familiar – haven’t we heard this story before somewhere?). What’s more, this ‘correction’ can only be found by ‘GIA modelling’. In other words, the only justification for any sea level rise at all is in the modelling assumptions of the ‘climate scientists’ involved.

]]>