Comments on: The IPCC Numbers Game: 4000 = 60 http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/ Bridging the gap between reality and official science Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:37:37 +1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: RSS agregator » Blog Archive » THe Definitive GLobal Warming DEBUNK - Copernicus, Einstein, Newton and Gore http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5833 RSS agregator » Blog Archive » THe Definitive GLobal Warming DEBUNK - Copernicus, Einstein, Newton and Gore Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:05:52 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5833 [...] studies get far more rigorous peer review on blogs after publication than in journals’ - Analysis: The UN IPCC Numbers Game: 4000 scientists = 60 scientists - Study finds Sea Level Rise Slows by 20% - Lower than IPCC Estimates! - ‘No evidence for [...] [...] studies get far more rigorous peer review on blogs after publication than in journals’ – Analysis: The UN IPCC Numbers Game: 4000 scientists = 60 scientists – Study finds Sea Level Rise Slows by 20% – Lower than IPCC Estimates! – ‘No evidence for [...]

]]> By: admin http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5507 admin Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:32:05 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5507 Thanks John, your painstaking work is appreciated. I'd be interested in having the spreadsheets: climatetruth@gmail.com Thanks John, your painstaking work is appreciated. I’d be interested in having the spreadsheets: climatetruth@gmail.com

]]> By: John McLean http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5498 John McLean Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:24:29 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5498 My email address was provided at the top of that document for any readers who had questions. I would be happy to send Barry (or CRN) a spreadsheet of all authors in which I identify those whose names are duplicates. In an update to my work I have reduced that 2873 even further by identify where hyphenated names were used in some places but no hyphen appeared in the same name somewhere else. I have also found a few names where the first name and second name were in different order in the IPCC's lists. My email address was provided at the top of that document for any readers who had questions. I would be happy to send Barry (or CRN) a spreadsheet of all authors in which I identify those whose names are duplicates.

In an update to my work I have reduced that 2873 even further by identify where hyphenated names were used in some places but no hyphen appeared in the same name somewhere else. I have also found a few names where the first name and second name were in different order in the IPCC’s lists.

]]> By: admin http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5265 admin Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:13:08 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5265 That's a good point Barry, but before anyone makes or repeats the claim that there is a 'consensus' of 2500 or 4000 scientists, they should check the report thoroughly first. The reviewers comments and lead authors responses, which is usually a rejection, are also available online and make interesting reading. That’s a good point Barry, but before anyone makes or repeats the claim that there is a ‘consensus’ of 2500 or 4000 scientists, they should check the report thoroughly first. The reviewers comments and lead authors responses, which is usually a rejection, are also available online and make interesting reading.

]]> By: Barry http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5246 Barry Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:09:55 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5246 Being an opinion peice, I'm not to botherd that the article only gives afew select examples, but if it wanted to be transparent it would be nice for it to actualy show all the names and duplications it claims, while it would make for tedious reading, atleast it would be convincing, rather than just empty conjecture Being an opinion peice, I’m not to botherd that the article only gives afew select examples, but if it wanted to be transparent it would be nice for it to actualy show all the names and duplications it claims, while it would make for tedious reading, atleast it would be convincing, rather than just empty conjecture

]]> By: bill-tb http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/01/the-ipcc-numbers-game-4000-60/comment-page-1/#comment-5003 bill-tb Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:39:16 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=646#comment-5003 It's always been a fraud, perpetrated by a few, there never were 2500 reviewers. It’s always been a fraud, perpetrated by a few, there never were 2500 reviewers.

]]>