<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quiet Sun: Who Saw it Coming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/04/quiet-sun-who-saw-it-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/04/quiet-sun-who-saw-it-coming/</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between reality and official science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Gerhard Loebert</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/04/quiet-sun-who-saw-it-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-19361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Gerhard Loebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=913#comment-19361</guid>
		<description>Climate Change Cycles, Galactic Vacuum Density Waves, and the Orbital Periods of the Planets

Dr. Gerhard Löbert
Physicist. Recipient of The Needle of Honor of German Aeronautics.
Conveyor of a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation that not only covers the well-known Einstein effects but also explains, among many other post-Einstein-effects, the Sun-Earth-Connection and the true cause of the global climate changes.


Abstract: In a previous Note (see Ref.) it was shown that climate change is driven by solar activity which in turn is caused by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the core of the Sun. Irrefutable proof of the existence of these super-Einsteinian waves is given by the extremely close correlation between the changes in the mean global surface temperature and the small changes in the rotational velocity of the Earth - two physically unrelated geophysical quantities - in the past 150 years  (see Fig. 2.2 of  www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm  or  Ref.). In the present Note it is shown that the orbital periods of the planets provide further evidence.

In an excellent paper by the late Dr. Theodor Landscheidt (see www.schulphysik.de/klima/landscheidt/iceage.htm) it was shown that the Sun&#039;s Gleissberg activity cycles are closely correlated with the oscillations of the Sun around the center of mass of the solar system. The first and second space derivatives of the gravitational potential of the planets in the vicinity of the Sun are, however, so minute that it cannot be envisaged how the extremely slow motion of the Sun about the center of mass of the solar system could physically influence the processes within the Sun. It is much more likely that a common external agent is driving both the Gleissberg cycle and the related oscillatory barycentric motion of the Sun. 

The small motion of the Sun is, of course, determined, almost entirely, by the motion of the large planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune that revolve around the Sun with periods of 11.87, 29.63, 84.67, and 165.49 years respectively. Note that the sunspot cycle has a mean period of 11.07 years (see T. Niroma in  www.personal.inet.fi/tiede/tilmari/sunspot4.html) and in my previous Note &quot;A Compilation of the Arguments that Irrefutably Prove that Climate Change is driven by Solar Activity and not by CO2 Emission&quot; of March 6, 2008 (see Ref.), I pointed out that the mean surface temperature of the Earth is changing in a quasi-periodic manner with a mean period of 70 years, approximately. If we stipulate for the moment that there exists - in addition to the 70-years wave - a galactic vacuum density wave of 11.07 years period that is driving the sunspot cycle, then the addition of both waves leads to a periodic amplitude modulation with a period of  2/(1/11.07 - 1/70) = 26.3 years. 

If two galactic gravitational wave trains of 11.07 and 70 years period were to pass through the solar system, the gravitational action of these waves on the revolving planets would slowly relocate these celestial bodies until the orbital periods were close to 11.07, 26.3, and 70 years, the periods given by the combined wave train. The orbital periods of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus are 7%, 13%, and 20% higher than these values. A close lock-in cannot be expected because of the gravitational actions of the neighboring planets and because of the large variability of the periods of the vacuum density wave trains (see the large variability of the sunspot and surface temperature cycles). 

If one considers all of the documented sunspot cycles, the mean Gleissberg cycle length increases to 78.5 years (see T. Niroma). With this value, the orbital period excess of Uranus reduces from 20% to 7%. Note also that the orbital period of Neptune is 5% larger than 2 times the mean Gleissberg period and that of Pluto is 7% larger than 3 times Gleissberg. 

Now to the remaining planets. The following table shows the ratio of the mean sunspot cycle period of 11.07 years to the planet orbital period.

Mars =  6  -  0.11          Earth = 11 + 0.07   
Venus = 18 - 0.01         Mercury = 46 - 0.04   

With an average error of 6% of an orbital period,  the orbital periods are whole-number fractions of the mean sunspot cycle period. 

As can be seen, the 11.07 years and 78.5 years galactic wave trains have brought  good order into the Solar System. The degree of order increases with the number of orbital revolutions per million years.

In my opinion, the orbital periods of the planets provide -- in addition to the extremely close temperature-rotation-correlation -- further evidence for the existence of galactic vacuum density waves with mean long-term periods of 11.07 and 78.5 years.   

Ref.:  www.icecap.us/images/uploads/Lobert_on_CO2.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Change Cycles, Galactic Vacuum Density Waves, and the Orbital Periods of the Planets</p>
<p>Dr. Gerhard Löbert<br />
Physicist. Recipient of The Needle of Honor of German Aeronautics.<br />
Conveyor of a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation that not only covers the well-known Einstein effects but also explains, among many other post-Einstein-effects, the Sun-Earth-Connection and the true cause of the global climate changes.</p>
<p>Abstract: In a previous Note (see Ref.) it was shown that climate change is driven by solar activity which in turn is caused by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the core of the Sun. Irrefutable proof of the existence of these super-Einsteinian waves is given by the extremely close correlation between the changes in the mean global surface temperature and the small changes in the rotational velocity of the Earth &#8211; two physically unrelated geophysical quantities &#8211; in the past 150 years  (see Fig. 2.2 of  <a href="http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm</a>  or  Ref.). In the present Note it is shown that the orbital periods of the planets provide further evidence.</p>
<p>In an excellent paper by the late Dr. Theodor Landscheidt (see <a href="http://www.schulphysik.de/klima/landscheidt/iceage.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.schulphysik.de/klima/landscheidt/iceage.htm</a>) it was shown that the Sun&#8217;s Gleissberg activity cycles are closely correlated with the oscillations of the Sun around the center of mass of the solar system. The first and second space derivatives of the gravitational potential of the planets in the vicinity of the Sun are, however, so minute that it cannot be envisaged how the extremely slow motion of the Sun about the center of mass of the solar system could physically influence the processes within the Sun. It is much more likely that a common external agent is driving both the Gleissberg cycle and the related oscillatory barycentric motion of the Sun. </p>
<p>The small motion of the Sun is, of course, determined, almost entirely, by the motion of the large planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune that revolve around the Sun with periods of 11.87, 29.63, 84.67, and 165.49 years respectively. Note that the sunspot cycle has a mean period of 11.07 years (see T. Niroma in  <a href="http://www.personal.inet.fi/tiede/tilmari/sunspot4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.personal.inet.fi/tiede/tilmari/sunspot4.html</a>) and in my previous Note &#8220;A Compilation of the Arguments that Irrefutably Prove that Climate Change is driven by Solar Activity and not by CO2 Emission&#8221; of March 6, 2008 (see Ref.), I pointed out that the mean surface temperature of the Earth is changing in a quasi-periodic manner with a mean period of 70 years, approximately. If we stipulate for the moment that there exists &#8211; in addition to the 70-years wave &#8211; a galactic vacuum density wave of 11.07 years period that is driving the sunspot cycle, then the addition of both waves leads to a periodic amplitude modulation with a period of  2/(1/11.07 &#8211; 1/70) = 26.3 years. </p>
<p>If two galactic gravitational wave trains of 11.07 and 70 years period were to pass through the solar system, the gravitational action of these waves on the revolving planets would slowly relocate these celestial bodies until the orbital periods were close to 11.07, 26.3, and 70 years, the periods given by the combined wave train. The orbital periods of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus are 7%, 13%, and 20% higher than these values. A close lock-in cannot be expected because of the gravitational actions of the neighboring planets and because of the large variability of the periods of the vacuum density wave trains (see the large variability of the sunspot and surface temperature cycles). </p>
<p>If one considers all of the documented sunspot cycles, the mean Gleissberg cycle length increases to 78.5 years (see T. Niroma). With this value, the orbital period excess of Uranus reduces from 20% to 7%. Note also that the orbital period of Neptune is 5% larger than 2 times the mean Gleissberg period and that of Pluto is 7% larger than 3 times Gleissberg. </p>
<p>Now to the remaining planets. The following table shows the ratio of the mean sunspot cycle period of 11.07 years to the planet orbital period.</p>
<p>Mars =  6  &#8211;  0.11          Earth = 11 + 0.07<br />
Venus = 18 &#8211; 0.01         Mercury = 46 &#8211; 0.04   </p>
<p>With an average error of 6% of an orbital period,  the orbital periods are whole-number fractions of the mean sunspot cycle period. </p>
<p>As can be seen, the 11.07 years and 78.5 years galactic wave trains have brought  good order into the Solar System. The degree of order increases with the number of orbital revolutions per million years.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the orbital periods of the planets provide &#8212; in addition to the extremely close temperature-rotation-correlation &#8212; further evidence for the existence of galactic vacuum density waves with mean long-term periods of 11.07 and 78.5 years.   </p>
<p>Ref.:  <a href="http://www.icecap.us/images/uploads/Lobert_on_CO2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.icecap.us/images/uploads/Lobert_on_CO2.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

