Comments
Naked Bias in IPCC AR4 WG1 Chapter 3 Revisited
“So almost five years after we first submitted our paper how does it hold up? Pretty well I think, on all counts. I would not change any of the conclusions above, nor would I change the reply to Anthes et al. Science changes and moves ahead, so any review will eventually become outdated, but ours was an accurate reflection of the state of science as of 2005. However, you won’t find any of this in the IPCC.”
Roger Pielke Jr.’s blog: The “Shameful Article”: A Review and Update