Comments on: Climate Alarmism Meltdown: Climate Clown Brown Insults Over Half of Voters http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/12/climate-alarmism-meltdown-climate-clown-brown-insults-over-half-of-voters/ Bridging the gap between reality and official science Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:26:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: admin http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/12/climate-alarmism-meltdown-climate-clown-brown-insults-over-half-of-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-36161 admin Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:58:37 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=1679#comment-36161 The car has no wheels, no engine, and the driver isn't CO2. There's no scientific discussion in calling voters 'flat-earthers' (flat earth being consensus science before we knew better). Climate alarmism relies on computer models, not reality. Climate realists don't have to prove anything - they aren't the ones asking for money or restrictions - climate alarmists have to provide the proof. The car has no wheels, no engine, and the driver isn’t CO2. There’s no scientific discussion in calling voters ‘flat-earthers’ (flat earth being consensus science before we knew better). Climate alarmism relies on computer models, not reality. Climate realists don’t have to prove anything – they aren’t the ones asking for money or restrictions – climate alarmists have to provide the proof.

]]> By: friso http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/12/climate-alarmism-meltdown-climate-clown-brown-insults-over-half-of-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-36160 friso Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:38:27 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=1679#comment-36160 So, if you buy a car and the windshield wiper is broken, do you discard the whole car as being not functional? Where is the SCIENTIFIC discussion? If the SCIENTIFIC data suggests there is reason for alarm, is sounding the alarm exaggerated? Brown is right... "Global warming is not our fault" ?? Is just an opinion. Where is the proof? It's true that most websites such as this one just throws sand in someones eyes, no foundation whatsoever is given for the statements. Seeding doubt is hardly scientific... So, if you buy a car and the windshield wiper is broken, do you discard the whole car as being not functional? Where is the SCIENTIFIC discussion? If the SCIENTIFIC data suggests there is reason for alarm, is sounding the alarm exaggerated? Brown is right…

“Global warming is not our fault” ?? Is just an opinion. Where is the proof?

It’s true that most websites such as this one just throws sand in someones eyes, no foundation whatsoever is given for the statements. Seeding doubt is hardly scientific…

]]>