Climate Research News

Climate Research News

Bridging the gap between reality and official science

Climate Research News Comments Feed Comments Climate Research News Entries Feed Entries
 
 
 
 
«
»

Climate Realist Benny Peiser v Alarmist Robin McKie in The Observer

Has the science of climate change been undermined by email leaks and the IPCC’s glacier error?

The Observer: Robin McKie v Benny Peiser

February 8th, 2010 | Tags: | Category: Opinion | Subscribe to comments | Leave a comment | Trackback URL

4 Responses to “Climate Realist Benny Peiser v Alarmist Robin McKie in The Observer”

  1. 1
    trafamadore:
    February 8th, 2010 at 8:19 am

    I like the suggestion that the GW deniers should come up with data that argues that the world will not overheat, instead of their constant nitpicking of details that don’t change overall conclusions.

  2. 2
    admin:
    February 8th, 2010 at 8:28 am

    ‘Denier’ is a silly word that you might apply to yourself. Go read the leaked CRU emails and see how the IPCC and peer review processes are ‘nobbled’ by the 20 or so CRUminals. There’s no ‘nitpicking’ going on – it’s exposure of deliberate misinformation, alarmism, a lack of due diligence, and the extensive use of non-peer reviewed NGO studies by the IPCC, plus Pachauri’s hypocrisy and conflict of interests, and so on.

  3. 3
    BenAW:
    February 9th, 2010 at 12:55 am

    @trafamadore
    “I like the suggestion that the GW deniers should come up with data that argues that the world will not overheat”
    This is putting things upside down. Those who propose the theory that human produced CO2 causes the world to overheat must prove that claim. Haven’t seen anything like that sofar.
    Fact is that my garden plants love CO2 and it seems to increase the world foodproduction with a sizeable amount as well.

  4. 4
    Mike Davis:
    February 10th, 2010 at 5:59 am

    I think it is intriguing that Ms. Robin calls a “Luke Warmist” a “Denialist”. I recon it all depends on where one is on the “Yard Stick” used to measure each person’s position regarding the “Climate Issue”. Ms. Robin appears to be so far into the catastrophe hole that she no longer needs to have evidence to support her cult like beliefs. I gave up reading before the end as I saw no real information exchange and the person in denial appeared to be Ms. Robin.
    Proponents of a theory need to provide evidence that the theory is sound and opponents only need to show reasonable doubt. Similar to a court of law. I have seen no “Real World” evidence that supports more than natural climate variation based on thousands/ millions of years of climate history.
    I will not question your descriptor of Benny as a “Climate Realist” As I respect his position. However Ms. Robin appears to be a “Cult Propagandist” and her opinion belongs in the religious section of the paper.

Leave a Reply

 

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Archives

Categories

Tags

Links

Twitter

Miniposts

New Booker Book: The Real Global Warming Disaster
Christopher Booker has a new book out entitled: The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is The Obsession With `Climate Change` Turning Out To Be The Most Costly Scientific Blunder In History? Available from Amazon UK here: More from Booker himself here. (1)

Why the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are Not Collapsing
Read the AIG News paper here. (1)

Global Warming Ate My Data
We’ve lost the numbers: CRU responds to FOIA requests. The Register (3)

Climate Depot's Arctic Fact Sheet
Climate Depot Arctic Fact Sheet (for additional updates on the Arctic see new articles tagged Arctic) (0)

Feedback

climatetruth@gmail.com

Meta