Climate Research News

Climate Research News

Bridging the gap between reality and official science

Climate Research News Comments Feed Comments Climate Research News Entries Feed Entries
 
 
 
 

Climategate Statements from Physics, Chemistry and Statistical Societies

The Institute of Physics statement on Climategate to the UK Parliamentary Committee is here.

The Royal Society of Chemistry Statement is here.

The Royal Statistical Society statement is here.

All three make strong critical statements on the scientific/data practices of UEA/CRU.

3 Responses to “Climategate Statements from Physics, Chemistry and Statistical Societies”

  1. 1
    Nils-Axel Mörner:

    Geology is another brach that has been deeply misused by IPCC. The sea level scenarion that IPCC is driving is NOT founded in observational facts, but only in computer modelling. True field data show nor sea level rise in the Maltives, no rise in Tuvalu, no rise in Vanuatu and, just established (October 2009) not even in Bangladesh. This is just to mentioned a few sites that by IPCC have been doomed to become flooded before the end of this svntury.

  2. 2
    Ben Lawson:

    “All three make strong critical statements on the scientific/data practices of UEA/CRU”

    That’s an interesting, and careful, selection of submissions.

    How ’bout the conclusions of the Inquiry?

    Within our limited inquiry and the evidence we took, the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact. We have found no reason in this unfortunate episode to challenge the scientific consensus as expressed by Professor Beddington, that “global warming is happening [and] that it is induced by human activity”.

    Or of the Scientific Appraisal Panel?

    no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice

  3. 3
    admin:

    The results of the ‘limited inquiry’ were covered here:

    http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/mps-climategate-report-published-whitewash-with-dissent/

    ‘Global warming is happening’ is a straw-man argument, and ‘human induced climate change’ remains an unproven hypothesis that looks ever more unlikely despite the establishment whitewashing the establishment.

    Nothing is happening in the climate system that is outside of natural variability, despite man-made CO2 emissions.

Leave a Reply

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Categories

Tags

Links

Twitter

Miniposts

New Booker Book: The Real Global Warming Disaster
Christopher Booker has a new book out entitled: The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is The Obsession With `Climate Change` Turning Out To Be The Most Costly Scientific Blunder In History? Available from Amazon UK here: More from Booker himself here. (1)

Why the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are Not Collapsing
Read the AIG News paper here. (1)

Global Warming Ate My Data
We’ve lost the numbers: CRU responds to FOIA requests. The Register (3)

Climate Depot's Arctic Fact Sheet
Climate Depot Arctic Fact Sheet (for additional updates on the Arctic see new articles tagged Arctic) (0)

Feedback

Meta