Comments on: Climategate Statements from Physics, Chemistry and Statistical Societies http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/climategate-statements-from-physics-chemistry-and-statistical-societies/ Bridging the gap between reality and official science Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:26:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: admin http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/climategate-statements-from-physics-chemistry-and-statistical-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-45214 admin Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:38:14 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=2117#comment-45214 The results of the 'limited inquiry' were covered here: http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/mps-climategate-report-published-whitewash-with-dissent/ 'Global warming is happening' is a straw-man argument, and 'human induced climate change' remains an unproven hypothesis that looks ever more unlikely despite the establishment whitewashing the establishment. Nothing is happening in the climate system that is outside of natural variability, despite man-made CO2 emissions. The results of the ‘limited inquiry’ were covered here:

http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/mps-climategate-report-published-whitewash-with-dissent/

‘Global warming is happening’ is a straw-man argument, and ‘human induced climate change’ remains an unproven hypothesis that looks ever more unlikely despite the establishment whitewashing the establishment.

Nothing is happening in the climate system that is outside of natural variability, despite man-made CO2 emissions.

]]> By: Ben Lawson http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/climategate-statements-from-physics-chemistry-and-statistical-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-45208 Ben Lawson Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:50 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=2117#comment-45208 "All three make strong critical statements on the scientific/data practices of UEA/CRU" That's an interesting, and careful, selection of submissions. How 'bout the conclusions of the Inquiry? <blockquote>Within our limited inquiry and the evidence we took, the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact. We have found no reason in this unfortunate episode to challenge the scientific consensus as expressed by Professor Beddington, that "global warming is happening [and] that it is induced by human activity".</blockquote> Or of the Scientific Appraisal Panel? <blockquote>no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice</blockquote> “All three make strong critical statements on the scientific/data practices of UEA/CRU”

That’s an interesting, and careful, selection of submissions.

How ’bout the conclusions of the Inquiry?

Within our limited inquiry and the evidence we took, the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact. We have found no reason in this unfortunate episode to challenge the scientific consensus as expressed by Professor Beddington, that “global warming is happening [and] that it is induced by human activity”.

Or of the Scientific Appraisal Panel?

no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice

]]> By: Nils-Axel Mörner http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/climategate-statements-from-physics-chemistry-and-statistical-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-42576 Nils-Axel Mörner Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:10:26 +0000 http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=2117#comment-42576 Geology is another brach that has been deeply misused by IPCC. The sea level scenarion that IPCC is driving is NOT founded in observational facts, but only in computer modelling. True field data show nor sea level rise in the Maltives, no rise in Tuvalu, no rise in Vanuatu and, just established (October 2009) not even in Bangladesh. This is just to mentioned a few sites that by IPCC have been doomed to become flooded before the end of this svntury. Geology is another brach that has been deeply misused by IPCC. The sea level scenarion that IPCC is driving is NOT founded in observational facts, but only in computer modelling. True field data show nor sea level rise in the Maltives, no rise in Tuvalu, no rise in Vanuatu and, just established (October 2009) not even in Bangladesh. This is just to mentioned a few sites that by IPCC have been doomed to become flooded before the end of this svntury.

]]>