<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Research News &#187; Global CO2 Emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateresearchnews.com/tag/global-co2-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateresearchnews.com</link>
	<description>Bridging the gap between reality and official science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Airborne Fraction of Human CO2 Emissions Constant for Past 40 Years</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/11/airborne-fraction-of-human-co2-emissions-constant-for-past-40-years/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/11/airborne-fraction-of-human-co2-emissions-constant-for-past-40-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to 35 billion tons a year now. This suggests that terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to 35 billion tons a year now.</p>
	<p>This suggests that terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans have a much greater capacity to absorb CO2 than had been previously expected.</p>
	<p>The results run contrary to a significant body of recent research which expects that the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase, letting greenhouse gas levels skyrocket. Dr Wolfgang Knorr at the University of Bristol found that in fact the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has only been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, which is essentially zero.</p>
	<p>The strength of the new study, published online in Geophysical Research Letters, is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, including historical records extracted from Antarctic ice, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models.</p>
	<p>This work is extremely important for climate change policy, because emission targets to be negotiated at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen early next month have been based on projections that have a carbon free sink of already factored in. Some researchers have cautioned against this approach, pointing at evidence that suggests the sink has already started to decrease.</p>
	<p>So is this good news for climate negotiations in Copenhagen? “Not necessarily”, says Knorr. “Like all studies of this kind, there are uncertainties in the data, so rather than relying on Nature to provide a free service, soaking up our waste carbon, we need to ascertain why the proportion being absorbed has not changed”.</p>
	<p>Another result of the study is that emissions from deforestation might have been overestimated by between 18 and 75 per cent. This would agree with results published last week in Nature Geoscience by a team led by Guido van der Werf from VU University Amsterdam. They re-visited deforestation data and concluded that emissions have been overestimated by at least a factor of two.</p>
	<p style="text-align: left;">University of Bristol <a href="http://www.bris.ac.uk/news/2009/6649.html" target="_blank">Press Release</a>, 9th November 2009</p>
	<p>The paper: <a href="http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2009GL040613.shtml" target="_blank">Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing?</a> by Wolfgang Knorr. Geophysical Research Letters, VOL. 36, L21710, doi:10.1029/2009GL040613, 2009.</p>
	<p>Abstract:</p>
	<p>Several recent studies have highlighted the possibility that the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems have started loosing part of their ability to sequester a large proportion of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This is an important claim, because so far only about 40% of those emissions have stayed in the atmosphere, which has prevented additional climate change. This study re-examines the available atmospheric CO2 and emissions data including their uncertainties. It is shown that with those uncertainties, the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, i.e. close to and not significantly different from zero. The analysis further shows that the statistical model of a constant airborne fraction agrees best with the available data if emissions from land use change are scaled down to 82% or less of their original estimates. Despite the predictions of coupled climate-carbon cycle models, no trend in the airborne fraction can be found.</p>
	<p>World Climate Report analysis <a href="http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2009/11/10/airborne-fraction-of-human-co2-emissions-constant-over-time/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/11/airborne-fraction-of-human-co2-emissions-constant-for-past-40-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession Confirms Close Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/09/recession-confirms-close-relationship-between-co2-emissions-and-economic-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/09/recession-confirms-close-relationship-between-co2-emissions-and-economic-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=1317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FT carries a story today that demonstrates the close link between CO2 emissions and economic growth. Spun by the FT as carbon-climate claptrap, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reports and unparalleled fall in CO2 emissions, mainly due to falling industrial output, which will exceed even the 1981 recession driven by the oil crisis. The IEA sees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a0f0331c-a611-11de-8c92-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">FT</a> carries a story today that demonstrates the close link between CO2 emissions and economic growth. Spun by the FT as carbon-climate claptrap, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reports and unparalleled fall in CO2 emissions, mainly due to falling industrial output, which will exceed even the 1981 recession driven by the oil crisis. The IEA sees this as good news for the tenuous link between CO2 and climate. Not good news, of course, for those who have lost their livelihoods.</p>
	<p>Nice graph here of CO2 v GDP for 1990 to 2006:</p>
	<p><a href="http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/co2gdp.jpg" target="_blank">http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/co2gdp.jpg</a></p>
	<p>Roger Pielke Jr&#8217;s view on the FT article:</p>
	<p><a href="http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/09/much-ado-about-very-little.html" target="_blank">http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/09/much-ado-about-very-little.html</a></p>
	<p>and more from RPj on the FT&#8217;s &#8216;unrealism&#8217; here:</p>
	<p><a href="http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/09/unwarranted-credulity-in-ft.html" target="_blank">http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/09/unwarranted-credulity-in-ft.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/09/recession-confirms-close-relationship-between-co2-emissions-and-economic-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sayonara Kyoto: Global CO2 Emissions 40% Above 1990 Baseline</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/08/sayonara-kyoto-global-co2-emisions-40-above-1990-baseline/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/08/sayonara-kyoto-global-co2-emisions-40-above-1990-baseline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FRANKFURT, Aug 10 (Reuters) &#8211; Global carbon dioxide emissions in 2008 rose 1.94 percent year-on-year to 31.5 billion tonnes, German renewable energy industry institute IWR said on Monday, based on official information and its own research. The private institute, which is based in Muenster and advises German ministries, said climate-harming carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions rose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FRANKFURT, Aug 10 (Reuters) &#8211; Global carbon dioxide emissions in 2008 rose 1.94 percent year-on-year to 31.5 billion tonnes, German renewable energy industry institute IWR said on Monday, based on official information and its own research.</p>
	<p>The private institute, which is based in Muenster and advises German ministries, said <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">climate-harming</span> carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions rose for the tenth year in succession, running counter to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol aimed at trying to cut CO2 emissions by 5.2 percent by 2012.</p>
	<p>&#8220;Kyoto is not working out,&#8221; said IWR Managing Director Norbert Allnoch. Global emissions are 40 percent above those in 1990, the basis year for the treaty.</p>
	<p>Reuters:<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSLA354495" target="_blank"> &#8216;Global 2008 CO2 emissions rose 2 pct-German institute&#8217;</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/08/sayonara-kyoto-global-co2-emisions-40-above-1990-baseline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to the Future with Climate Bills</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/06/back-to-the-future-with-climate-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/06/back-to-the-future-with-climate-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first post on Roger Pielke Jr&#8217;s new blog on 14th June looked at CO2 emissions targets in terms of absolute emissions: If the world wants to achieve an 80% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions below 1990 levels this really means returning to 1939 levels of emissions. For the US, a 17% reduction in carbon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The <a href="http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/06/target-1939-case-for-absolute-baselines.html" target="_blank">first post</a> on Roger Pielke Jr&#8217;s new blog on 14th June looked at CO2 emissions targets in terms of absolute emissions:</p>
	<p>If the world wants to achieve an 80% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions below 1990 levels this really means returning to 1939 levels of emissions.</p>
	<p>For the US, a 17% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions below 2005 levels (such as in the Waxman-Markey Bill) represents a return to about 1990 levels. An 80% reduction represents a return to 1905 levels.</p>
	<p>For the United Kingdom, a reduction of 34% from 1990-(its 2022 interim target) represents a return to carbon dioxide emissions of 1896 and an 80% reduction (its 2050 target) represents a return to emissions of 1849. (Wow!)</p>
	<p>You can calculate other absolute baselines with the <a href="http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_coun.html" target="_blank">dataset here.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/06/back-to-the-future-with-climate-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adapting to the Inevitable: &#8216;CO2 Reduction Treaties Useless&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/02/adapting-to-the-inevitable-co2-reduction-treaties-useless/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/02/adapting-to-the-inevitable-co2-reduction-treaties-useless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report says treaties aimed at reducing CO2 emissions are useless. The Institution of Mechanical Engineers report says we have to accept the world could change dramatically. It also says we should start planning our major infrastructure now to accommodate more extreme weather events and sea level rises. While not against attempts to reduce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A new report says treaties aimed at reducing CO2 emissions are useless.</p>
	<p>The Institution of Mechanical Engineers report says we have to accept the world could change dramatically.</p>
	<p>It also says we should start planning our major infrastructure now to accommodate more extreme weather events and sea level rises.</p>
	<p>While not against attempts to reduce emissions, the report&#8217;s authors say we should be realistic about what can be achieved with this approach.</p>
	<p>&#8220;The existing Kyoto Protocol has, to date, been a near total failure.&#8221;</p>
	<p>BBC News website: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7888994.stm" target="_blank">&#8216;CO2 reduction treaties useless&#8217; </a></p>
	<p>Institution of Mechanical Engineers report (pdf): <a href="http://www.imeche.org/NR/rdonlyres/CBF13D63-D8F5-483C-BB64-981D610F373B/0/IMechEAdaptationreport.pdf" target="_blank">&#8216;Climate Change: Adaptating to the Inevitable&#8217;</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2009/02/adapting-to-the-inevitable-co2-reduction-treaties-useless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emission Impossible: Meaningful Atmospheric CO2 Reductions</title>
		<link>http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/emission-impossible-meaningful-atmospheric-co2-reductions/</link>
		<comments>http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/emission-impossible-meaningful-atmospheric-co2-reductions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global CO2 Emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresearchnews.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Roger Pielke Jr on his Prometheus blog, World Energy Outlook 2008 has been released by the IEA. Cutting to the chase, can atmospheric CO2 be stabilised at 450 ppmv using existing technology? The IEA says NO: &#8220;The scale of the challenge in the 450 Policy Scenario is immense: the 2030 emissions level for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>According to Roger Pielke Jr on his <a href="http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/iea-world-energy-outlook-4714" target="_blank">Prometheus blog</a>, World Energy Outlook 2008 has been released by the IEA.</p>
	<p>Cutting to the chase, can atmospheric CO2 be stabilised at 450 ppmv using existing technology? The IEA says NO:</p>
	<p>&#8220;The scale of the challenge in the 450 Policy Scenario is immense: the 2030 emissions level for the world as a whole in this scenario is less than the level of projected emissions for non-OECD countries alone in the Reference Scenario. In other words, the OECD countries alone cannot put the world onto the path to 450-ppm trajectory, even if they were to reduce their emissions to zero. Even leaving aside any debate about the political feasibility of the 450 Policy Scenario, it is uncertain whether the scale of the transformation envisaged is even technically achievable, as the scenario assumes broad deployment of technologies that have not yet been proven. The technology shift, if achievable, would certainly be unprecedented in scale and speed of deployment. Increased public and private spending on research and development in the near term would be essential to develop the advanced technologies needed to make the 450 Policy Scenario a reality.&#8221;</p>
	<p>If every new power plant built from today onwards were to emit zero CO2, the impact on future emissions growth would be small:</p>
	<p>&#8220;The rate of capital-stock turnover is particularly slow in the power sector, where large up-front costs and long operating lifetimes mean that plants that have already been built — and their associated emissions — are effectively “locked-in”. In the Reference Scenario, three-quarters of the projected output of electricity worldwide in 2020 (and more than half in 2030) comes from power stations that are already operating today. As a result, even if all power plants built from now onwards were carbon-free, CO2 emissions from the power sector would still be only 25%, or 4 Gt, lower in 2020 relative to the Reference Scenario.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Read the Executive Summary of the IEA World Energy Outlook 2008 <a href="http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/WEO2008SUM.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
	<p>Climate Research News maintains that current climate policy is indeed emission impossible and will not have any measurable effect on climate even if successful at reducing CO2 emissions. Climate policy should therefore be separated from energy policy as a matter of urgency.</p>
	<p><strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
	<p>See related post on Prometheus: <a href="http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/understating-the-mitigation-challenge-iea-2008-4718" target="_blank">&#8216;Understating the Mitigation Challenge, IEA 2008&#8242;</a></p>
	<p>Today I’d like to illustrate how the IEA’s World Energy Outlook, published yesterday, also dramatically underestimates the magnitude of the mitigation challenge&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climateresearchnews.com/2008/11/emission-impossible-meaningful-atmospheric-co2-reductions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

